How to beat Mono Red Madness in Pauper

Over the last 90 days of recorded Pauper matches, the decks with the best results against Mono Red Madness are Mono Red Rally (81% over 16 matches), Golgari Gardens (89% over 9 matches) and 4c Affinity (86% over 7 matches). Mono Red Rally's 81% sits in a 95% range of 57%–93%, which is the range a 16-match sample actually supports. The decks with the best records against it most often carry Pyroblast, Blue Elemental Blast and Red Elemental Blast in the sideboard — those are their sideboards in general, not cards chosen for this matchup.

Best records against Mono Red Madness

Matches played in the last 90 days, from events that publish round-by-round pairings. Ranked by the bottom of each 95% range, not by the headline percentage, so a small sample cannot outrank a large one.

Archetypes with the best recorded results against Mono Red Madness, best first
DeckWin rate vs Mono Red MadnessRecordMatchesSample95% range
Mono Red Rally81.3%13-316Medium sample57%–93%
Golgari Gardens88.9%8-19Medium sample56%–98%
4c Affinity85.7%6-17Low sample49%–97%
4c Ephemerate85.7%6-17Low sample49%–97%
Ephemerate Tron56.7%17-1330High sample39%–73%
Ruby Storm80.0%4-15Low sample38%–96%
Grixis Affinity53.6%15-1328High sample36%–70%
Bogles66.7%6-39Medium sample35%–88%
Dimir Faeries57.1%8-614Medium sample33%–79%
Dimir Terror66.7%4-26Low sample30%–90%
Tron66.7%4-26Low sample30%–90%
Dimir Control54.5%6-511Medium sample28%–79%
Esper Affinity55.6%5-49Medium sample27%–81%
Snacker Gates57.1%4-37Low sample25%–84%
Mardu Synthesizer60.0%3-25Low sample23%–88%
  • High sample · 20+ matches
  • Medium sample · 8–19 matches
  • Low sample · 5–7 matches

23 further pairings (55 matches) fall below the 5-match floor and are not given a percentage. 4 pairings against archetypes that have left the Pauper metagame are excluded. Full history, retired archetypes included, is on Mono Red Madness's archetype page and in the Pauper matchup matrix.

What the decks that beat Mono Red Madness bring

Sideboard cards run by Mono Red Rally, Golgari Gardens, 4c Affinity, 4c Ephemerate, Ephemerate Tron. This is not a sideboard guide for this matchup. We record who beat whom, not what either player boarded, so these are whole-sideboard frequencies across every matchup those decks play — a hint about the kind of card that punishes Mono Red Madness, not a list to bring in.

CardDecks running itAverage copiesWhich decks
Pyroblast4 of 51.6Mono Red Rally, 4c Affinity, 4c Ephemerate, Ephemerate Tron
Blue Elemental Blast3 of 52.24c Affinity, 4c Ephemerate, Ephemerate Tron
Red Elemental Blast3 of 52.2Mono Red Rally, 4c Ephemerate, Ephemerate Tron
Hydroblast3 of 52.14c Affinity, 4c Ephemerate, Ephemerate Tron
Weather the Storm3 of 52.1Golgari Gardens, 4c Ephemerate, Ephemerate Tron
Breath Weapon3 of 50.84c Affinity, 4c Ephemerate, Ephemerate Tron
Vandalblast3 of 50.84c Affinity, 4c Ephemerate, Ephemerate Tron
Nihil Spellbomb2 of 50.94c Affinity, 4c Ephemerate
Troublemaker Ouphe1 of 53.0Golgari Gardens
Cast into the Fire1 of 52.8Mono Red Rally
Duress1 of 52.4Golgari Gardens
Krark-Clan Shaman1 of 51.84c Affinity

Average copies is expected copies per deck — average copies played multiplied by the share of that archetype's lists running the card — so a 4-of in half the lists reads as 2.0.

Decks Mono Red Madness beats

The other end of the same table. If you are choosing a deck to attack Mono Red Madness with, the record argues against these.

Archetypes Mono Red Madness has the best recorded results against, worst first for the challenger
DeckWin rate vs Mono Red MadnessRecordMatchesSample95% range
Spy Combo17.6%3-1417Medium sample6%–41%
Elves25.8%8-2331High sample14%–43%
Jund Wildfire26.7%4-1115Medium sample11%–52%
Gruul Ponza33.3%3-69Medium sample12%–65%
White Aggro40.0%4-610Medium sample17%–69%
Blue Terror40.0%2-35Low sample12%–77%
  • High sample · 20+ matches
  • Medium sample · 8–19 matches
  • Low sample · 5–7 matches

Questions

What beats Mono Red Madness in Pauper?

Across the last 90 days, Mono Red Rally (81% over 16 matches), Golgari Gardens (89% over 9 matches) and 4c Affinity (86% over 7 matches) hold the best recorded results against Mono Red Madness. Records come from events that publish round-by-round pairings, and both decks in a match have to be identified for it to count, so these are the pairings we can see rather than every match played.

What should I bring in against Mono Red Madness?

We do not have sideboard choices tied to individual matches, so this is not a sideboard guide. What the data supports is narrower: the 5 decks with the best records against Mono Red Madness — Mono Red Rally, Golgari Gardens, 4c Affinity, 4c Ephemerate and Ephemerate Tron — most commonly run Pyroblast, Blue Elemental Blast, Red Elemental Blast, Hydroblast and Weather the Storm in their sideboards. Those are whole-sideboard frequencies across every matchup those decks play.

What does Mono Red Madness beat?

Mono Red Madness's best recorded matchups over the same window are Spy Combo (82% across 17 matches), Elves (74% across 31 matches) and Jund Wildfire (73% across 15 matches). If you are picking a deck to attack Mono Red Madness with, these are the ones the record argues against.

How reliable are these Pauper matchup numbers?

Not very, and the page says so per row rather than in aggregate. Every pairing shows its match count, its sample band and a 95% range; the strongest band we award is 20+ matches, which is still roughly a ±20-point range around the figure shown. Pairings under 5 matches are counted but never given a percentage — there are 23 of those for Mono Red Madness right now. Rankings use the bottom of each range rather than the headline percentage, so a small sample cannot outrank a large one it has not earned.

What period does this cover?

Matches played in the last 90 days, filtered on when each match was actually played. Archetypes that have dropped out of the Pauper metagame are excluded from the ranking, which removes 4 pairings here — their historical records are still on Mono Red Madness's own archetype page and in the format matchup matrix.

What each number on this site measures, and where it is least reliable, is set out on the methodology page.