How to beat Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo in Modern
Over the last 90 days of recorded Modern matches, the decks with the best results against Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo are Amulet Titan (78% over 9 matches), Eldrazi Tron (55% over 11 matches) and Domain Zoo (56% over 9 matches). Amulet Titan's 78% sits in a 95% range of 45%–94%, which is the range a 9-match sample actually supports. The decks with the best records against it most often carry Consign to Memory, Mystical Dispute and Trinisphere in the sideboard — those are their sideboards in general, not cards chosen for this matchup.
Best records against Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo
Matches played in the last 90 days, from events that publish round-by-round pairings. Ranked by the bottom of each 95% range, not by the headline percentage, so a small sample cannot outrank a large one.
| Deck | Win rate vs Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo | Record | Matches | Sample | 95% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amulet Titan | 77.8% | 7-2 | 9 | Medium sample | 45%–94% |
| Eldrazi Tron | 54.5% | 6-5 | 11 | Medium sample | 28%–79% |
| Domain Zoo | 55.6% | 5-4 | 9 | Medium sample | 27%–81% |
| Ruby Storm | 55.6% | 5-4 | 9 | Medium sample | 27%–81% |
| Goryo's Vengeance | 57.1% | 4-3 | 7 | Low sample | 25%–84% |
| Eldrazi | 60.0% | 3-2 | 5 | Low sample | 23%–88% |
- High sample · 20+ matches
- Medium sample · 8–19 matches
- Low sample · 5–7 matches
21 further pairings (44 matches) fall below the 5-match floor and are not given a percentage. 3 pairings against archetypes that have left the Modern metagame are excluded. Full history, retired archetypes included, is on Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo's archetype page and in the Modern matchup matrix.
What the decks that beat Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo bring
Sideboard cards run by Amulet Titan, Eldrazi Tron, Domain Zoo, Ruby Storm, Goryo's Vengeance. This is not a sideboard guide for this matchup. We record who beat whom, not what either player boarded, so these are whole-sideboard frequencies across every matchup those decks play — a hint about the kind of card that punishes Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo, not a list to bring in.
| Card | Decks running it | Average copies | Which decks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consign to Memory | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | Domain Zoo, Goryo's Vengeance |
| Mystical Dispute | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | Domain Zoo, Goryo's Vengeance |
| Trinisphere | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | Amulet Titan, Eldrazi Tron |
| Wrath of the Skies | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | Domain Zoo, Goryo's Vengeance |
| Wear // Tear | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | Domain Zoo, Ruby Storm |
| Brotherhood's End | 2 of 5 | 1.1 | Domain Zoo, Ruby Storm |
| Grafdigger's Cage | 2 of 5 | 1.0 | Amulet Titan, Eldrazi Tron |
| Obsidian Charmaw | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | Domain Zoo |
| Dismember | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | Amulet Titan |
| Prismatic Ending | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | Ruby Storm |
| Orim's Chant | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | Ruby Storm |
| Disruptor Flute | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | Eldrazi Tron |
Average copies is expected copies per deck — average copies played multiplied by the share of that archetype's lists running the card — so a 4-of in half the lists reads as 2.0.
Decks Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo beats
The other end of the same table. If you are choosing a deck to attack Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo with, the record argues against these.
| Deck | Win rate vs Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo | Record | Matches | Sample | 95% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Affinity | 22.2% | 4-14 | 18 | Medium sample | 9%–45% |
| Rakdos Midrange | 36.4% | 4-7 | 11 | Medium sample | 15%–65% |
| Living End | 41.7% | 5-7 | 12 | Medium sample | 19%–68% |
| Boros Ponza | 33.3% | 2-4 | 6 | Low sample | 10%–70% |
| Devoted Combo | 45.5% | 5-6 | 11 | Medium sample | 21%–72% |
- High sample · 20+ matches
- Medium sample · 8–19 matches
- Low sample · 5–7 matches
Questions
What beats Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo in Modern?
Across the last 90 days, Amulet Titan (78% over 9 matches), Eldrazi Tron (55% over 11 matches) and Domain Zoo (56% over 9 matches) hold the best recorded results against Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo. Records come from events that publish round-by-round pairings, and both decks in a match have to be identified for it to count, so these are the pairings we can see rather than every match played.
What should I bring in against Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo?
We do not have sideboard choices tied to individual matches, so this is not a sideboard guide. What the data supports is narrower: the 5 decks with the best records against Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo — Amulet Titan, Eldrazi Tron, Domain Zoo, Ruby Storm and Goryo's Vengeance — most commonly run Consign to Memory, Mystical Dispute, Trinisphere, Wrath of the Skies and Wear // Tear in their sideboards. Those are whole-sideboard frequencies across every matchup those decks play.
What does Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo beat?
Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo's best recorded matchups over the same window are Affinity (78% across 18 matches), Rakdos Midrange (64% across 11 matches) and Living End (58% across 12 matches). If you are picking a deck to attack Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo with, these are the ones the record argues against.
How reliable are these Modern matchup numbers?
Not very, and the page says so per row rather than in aggregate. Every pairing shows its match count, its sample band and a 95% range; the strongest band we award is 20+ matches, which is still roughly a ±20-point range around the figure shown. Pairings under 5 matches are counted but never given a percentage — there are 21 of those for Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo right now. Rankings use the bottom of each range rather than the headline percentage, so a small sample cannot outrank a large one it has not earned.
What period does this cover?
Matches played in the last 90 days, filtered on when each match was actually played. Archetypes that have dropped out of the Modern metagame are excluded from the ranking, which removes 3 pairings here — their historical records are still on Mono-Green Basking Broodscale Combo's own archetype page and in the format matchup matrix.
What each number on this site measures, and where it is least reliable, is set out on the methodology page.